Not Elected Making Decisions

One of the things that’s wrong with America,

“People that are not elected making decisions.”

The statement “People that are not elected are making decisions” touches on a broad and complex issue that has been a subject of discussion in American politics and governance. This concern reflects a tension between democratic principles, which prioritize decisions made by elected officials as representatives of the people, and the practicalities of governance, which often involve unelected officials and experts.

In the United States, as in many other countries, a large bureaucracy exists to implement the laws and policies set forth by elected officials. These bureaucrats are not elected but are appointed based on their expertise and experience. While they are tasked with executing the will of the people as expressed through their elected representatives, concerns arise when it is perceived that these officials have too much power or when they make decisions that significantly influence policy without direct accountability to voters.

Regulatory agencies such as the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Federal Communications Commission (FCC), and Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) have significant power to create regulations that affect the economy, environment, communication, and financial sectors. These agencies are led by appointed officials, not directly elected by the public, which raises concerns about democratic legitimacy and accountability.

Judges, including those on the Supreme Court, are not elected but appointed based on their qualifications and legal expertise. Their decisions can have far-reaching implications on American law and society. While this system is designed to insulate them from political pressures, it also means that they are not directly accountable to the electorate.

Another aspect of the concern involves the influence of lobbyists and special interest groups, which are not elected but can have significant sway over legislation and policy through their advocacy, funding, and expertise. This influence raises questions about whose interests are being represented in the decision-making process.

The tension between democratic accountability and the need for expertise in governance is a core issue. On one hand, it’s important for decisions to be made by those with the necessary knowledge and expertise. On the other hand, ensuring that these decisions align with the democratic will and are subject to oversight by elected officials is crucial for maintaining democratic legitimacy.

Addressing these concerns involves ongoing debates about reforming the civil service, increasing transparency and oversight in the regulatory process, reforming campaign finance and lobbying laws, and exploring mechanisms to increase direct democratic participation.

The discussion about the role of unelected officials in American governance is a vital one, reflecting broader questions about how to best balance efficiency, expertise, and democratic accountability in a complex society. Different perspectives offer various solutions, but the underlying goal remains to ensure that the governance structure serves the public interest effectively and democratically.

George Soros is a Hungarian-American billionaire investor, philanthropist, and political activist known for his substantial influence in global and American politics, primarily through his donations to liberal and progressive causes.

Soros is the founder of the Open Society Foundations (OSF), a network of philanthropic organizations active in more than 100 countries. OSF aims to advance justice, education, public health, and independent media, among other objectives. In the United States, OSF has supported initiatives related to criminal justice reform, immigration, democratic governance, and more.

Soros has been a significant donor to Democratic candidates and causes. His contributions often focus on supporting candidates and initiatives that align with his views on democracy, civil rights, and social justice. Soros’s donations have included support for campaigns related to district attorney races, with a focus on criminal justice reform, as well as substantial contributions to PACs (Political Action Committees) supporting Democratic candidates.

Soros’s Critics accuse him of using his wealth to influence politics and policies in ways that they argue undermine national sovereignty and conservative values. Some attacks have been accused of being anti-Semitic, exploiting Soros’s Jewish background.

The debate over Soros’s influence is part of a larger discussion about the role of money in politics and the extent to which individuals and foundations can and should be able to use their resources to influence political and social outcomes.

Through his funding, Soros has influenced various policy areas, including criminal justice reform, where his contributions have supported progressive candidates for prosecutor positions. His funding has also supported organizations advocating for voting rights, immigration reform, and social justice.

While Soros’s influence in American politics is significant, his impact is global. He has been involved in supporting democratic transitions in Eastern Europe, promoting education through scholarships, and funding civil society initiatives worldwide.

Soros’s activities have spurred discussions about philanthropy’s role in democracy, with supporters applauding his commitment to open society principles and critics questioning his influence and motives.

George Soros is a polarizing figure in American politics, admired by many for his commitment to progressive causes and democracy, yet criticized and surrounded by conspiracy theories for his political donations and influence. His work through the Open Society Foundations highlights a broad interest in social justice, democracy, and human rights both in the U.S. and around the world.

Soros is attempting to control global politics and economies. Proponents argue that through his donations to political causes and civil society organizations, Soros is trying to orchestrate political outcomes and societal changes according to his personal agenda.

Soros manipulating elections, both in the United States and abroad. This includes claims that he funds efforts to rig voting machines, influence vote counting, or sway electoral outcomes through massive campaign contributions.

Soros has been accused of funding protests and civil unrest, including Black Lives Matter protests and the Antifa movement in the United States. Soros’s goal is to destabilize societies, undermine democratic institutions, and bring about social chaos.

Soros promotes mass migration and open borders to dilute national identities, undermine national sovereignty, and advance a globalist agenda. This includes accusations that he funds organizations supporting refugees and migrants to achieve these ends.

Soros’s history as a successful investor, particularly his bet against the British pound in 1992, which earned him substantial profits, has fueled theories that he manipulates economies for personal gain or political objectives.

Soros works to undermine national governments and promote a new world order through his funding of political movements, NGOs, and advocacy groups that challenge traditional state structures and policies.

During the COVID-19 pandemic, new conspiracy theories emerged suggesting that Soros was involved in the creation or spread of the virus, or that he profited from the pandemic. Some also claim that he supports public health measures, including lockdowns and vaccines, as tools for controlling populations.

Soros’s Open Society Foundations and other organizations have condemned these theories as unfounded and harmful, emphasizing their work in promoting democracy, human rights, and social justice.

Comparing George Soros and Elon Musk involves looking at two very different individuals who have made significant impacts in their respective fields. Both have accomplished remarkable feats, but their contributions and the nature of their work vary widely due to their different backgrounds, interests, and areas of influence.

George Soros is famously known for his career in finance and investing, particularly as the manager of the Quantum Fund, where he made substantial profits through large-scale currency trades. His most notable financial move was betting against the British pound in 1992, which earned him significant profits and the nickname “The Man Who Broke the Bank of England.”

Soros is also renowned for his philanthropic efforts through the Open Society Foundations (OSF), which he founded. OSF operates globally, supporting democracy, human rights, the rule of law, and access to education and healthcare. Soros has donated billions of dollars to these causes, impacting policies, social issues, and governance in numerous countries.

Through his philanthropy, Soros has influenced democratic elections, civil society movements, and policy reforms around the world. He has been a vocal supporter of liberal and progressive causes, contributing to changes in areas such as criminal justice, immigration, and social justice.

Elon Musk is best known as an entrepreneur and business magnate who has founded and led several high-profile technology companies. SpaceX, his aerospace manufacturer and space transport services company, aims to reduce space transportation costs and enable the colonization of Mars. Tesla, Inc., is a major player in electric vehicles, battery storage, and solar energy products, significantly influencing the automotive and energy sectors.

Musk has been instrumental in advancing technology and innovation across multiple industries. SpaceX has achieved significant milestones in reusable rockets, aiming for space accessibility and interplanetary travel. Tesla has pushed the automotive industry toward electric vehicles, contributing to the global shift away from fossil fuels.

Beyond SpaceX and Tesla, Musk has ventured into neural technology (Neuralink), high-speed transportation (The Boring Company), and artificial intelligence, reflecting his interest in shaping the future of humanity and solving global challenges like traffic congestion, renewable energy adoption, and multiplanetary living.

Elon Musk, the CEO of Tesla, SpaceX, and owner of Twitter has frequently expressed a strong interest in freedom of speech. His views on this subject have been particularly prominent in his public statements and business decisions, especially surrounding his acquisition of Twitter.

Musk’s acquisition of Twitter in 2022 was largely framed around his concerns over freedom of speech on the platform. He criticized Twitter’s content moderation policies, arguing that they were too restrictive and calling for a more open approach that allows a wider range of viewpoints. Musk has described himself as a “free speech absolutist,” suggesting he believes in very minimal restrictions on speech.

After taking over Twitter, Musk initiated several changes aimed at loosening the platform’s content moderation policies. This included reinstating accounts that had been previously banned or suspended for violating Twitter’s rules on hate speech, misinformation, and incitement to violence. He has argued that such changes are necessary to ensure that Twitter remains a platform for free expression.

Musk’s actions and statements regarding freedom of speech have been met with mixed reactions. Supporters argue that his approach is a necessary correction to what they see as excessive censorship and bias in social media moderation practices. Critics, however, worry that reducing content moderation could lead to the spread of misinformation, hate speech, and content that could incite violence, thereby harming public discourse and potentially leading to real-world consequences.

Musk’s tenure as Twitter’s owner highlights the complex balance between protecting freedom of speech and ensuring that social media platforms do not become conduits for harmful content. This balance is at the heart of ongoing debates about the role of social media in society, the responsibilities of platform owners, and the limits of free expression in digital spaces.

Musk’s advocacy for freedom of speech also intersects with broader discussions about regulation of social media platforms, the application of Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act in the United States (which provides immunity to website platforms from civil liabilities for the content posted by their users), and the global challenge of balancing free speech with protections against online harms.

Beyond Twitter, Musk’s interest in freedom of speech reflects in his criticism of government policies and actions that he perceives as infringing on individual liberties, including speech rights. His stance is part of a larger libertarian-leaning philosophy that prioritizes individual freedoms and minimal government intervention.

Elon Musk’s interest in freedom of speech is a defining aspect of his public persona and business decisions, especially evident in his approach to running Twitter. His actions have sparked significant debate about the nature of free speech in the digital age, the responsibilities of tech leaders and platforms, and how societies should navigate the challenges of maintaining open discourse while preventing harm.

Soros’s legacy is primarily in the realms of finance, philanthropy, and political activism, with a focus on promoting democracy and social justice worldwide. Musk’s impact, on the other hand, is rooted in technology, innovation, and entrepreneurship, with significant contributions to the automotive, aerospace, and renewable energy industries.

Soros has dedicated much of his fortune to societal and political changes, aiming to foster open societies, whereas Musk’s goals revolve around technological advancement, sustainability, and the future of humanity.

Both figures are subjects of public admiration as well as controversy. Soros is often embroiled in political controversies and conspiracy theories due to his political donations and activism. Musk is frequently in the spotlight for his outspoken personality, ambitious projects, and social media presence, which sometimes leads to public and regulatory scrutiny.

George Soros and Elon Musk have each made substantial contributions to society, albeit in very different ways. Soros’s influence is felt in the political and social spheres, particularly through his philanthropic work, while Musk’s contributions are technological and entrepreneurial, aiming to address global challenges and shape the future of humanity.

George Soros has supported Joe Biden and his presidency primarily through financial contributions to political action committees (PACs) and organizations that backed Biden’s candidacy and promote policy agendas aligned with Biden’s platform. Soros, a prominent financier and philanthropist known for his support of liberal and progressive causes, utilizes his resources to influence American politics and policy, aligning with his broader goals of promoting democracy, human rights, and social justice.

While direct donations to Biden’s campaign from individuals are capped by federal law, Soros has contributed significant amounts to PACs and Super PACs that have supported Biden’s campaign. These contributions are not made directly to Biden but are used to fund advertisements, outreach, and voter mobilization efforts that benefit his candidacy.

Soros has donated to several PACs that support Democratic candidates, including Biden. For example, ahead of the 2020 election, Soros was reported to have donated millions to Democratic PACs and Super PACs. These funds were used to support Democratic candidates across the board, including Joe Biden.

Through the Open Society Foundations, Soros funds a wide range of policy research and advocacy efforts on issues such as criminal justice reform, immigration policy, and voting rights—areas that align with some of the Biden administration’s policy priorities.

Soros’s support extends beyond electoral politics to backing movements and organizations advocating for policy changes in line with those proposed by the Biden administration. This includes support for policies on climate change, health care, and economic inequality.

While Soros’s support for Biden and his presidency is part of his broader philanthropic and political strategy, it’s aimed at shaping public policy and opinion on key issues. Soros’s contributions help fund advocacy and mobilization efforts that align with Biden’s policy goals, thereby indirectly supporting the administration’s agenda.

Soros’s engagement in the political process, including his support for Biden and other Democrats, reflects his commitment to using his resources to support what he views as democratic values and policies that promote social justice and equality.

It’s important to note that while Soros is a significant figure in political philanthropy, he is one of many individuals and entities that contribute to the political process in the United States. His support for Joe Biden and the presidency is part of a larger tapestry of political donations and advocacy efforts aimed at

George Soros has supported Hillary Clinton, particularly during her 2016 presidential campaign. Soros, a billionaire investor and philanthropist known for his donations to liberal and progressive causes, has been a significant supporter of Democratic candidates and issues in the United States and around the world.

During the 2016 election cycle, Soros contributed millions of dollars to political action committees (PACs) supporting Hillary Clinton’s candidacy. This included significant donations to PACs like Priorities USA Action, which was the main Super PAC supporting Clinton’s campaign.

Soros’s support for Clinton was not just financial; it was also rooted in a shared commitment to a range of policy issues, including women’s rights, immigration reform, healthcare, and climate change. Both Soros and Clinton have advocated for progressive policies on these and other issues.

Beyond financial contributions, Soros publicly supported Clinton’s candidacy, viewing her as a candidate who would pursue policies aligned with his vision of an open society. His support was part of a broader strategy to back candidates and causes that promote democratic governance, human rights, and social justice.

Soros’s support for Clinton, as with his other political activities, has made him a target of criticism and conspiracy theories, particularly from some conservative and right-wing groups. These groups often portray Soros’s contributions as part of a larger agenda to influence American politics and policies in ways they disagree with.

George Soros’s support for Hillary Clinton is consistent with his broader pattern of supporting Democratic candidates and progressive causes. His financial contributions and public endorsements reflect his involvement in the political process and his desire to support candidates whose policy positions align with his own.

The tragic 2012 attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi spawned numerous conspiracy theories regarding Clinton’s role and response as Secretary of State. Similarly, her use of a private email server led to unfounded theories about the nature and security of classified information handled.

One of the most enduring theories is the “Clinton Body Count,” suggesting that the Clintons are responsible for a series of deaths of people who were allegedly about to expose wrongdoing by the Clintons.

Conspiracy theorists have falsely claimed that as Secretary of State, Clinton approved the sale of Uranium One to Russian interests in exchange for donations to the Clinton Foundation.

During the 2016 presidential campaign, there were numerous theories about Clinton’s health, suggesting she was suffering from various serious medical conditions, based on misinterpretations of public appearances and doctored evidence.

Clinton and her campaign manager, John Podesta, were involved in a child sex ring operating out of a Washington, D.C., pizza restaurant. This theory was completely fabricated and led to a dangerous incident where a man fired a gun inside the restaurant.

DNC staffer Seth Rich, who was murdered in Washington, D.C., in July 2016, was involved in leaking DNC emails to WikiLeaks and was killed as part of a cover-up, implicating Clinton and the DNC.

QAnon followers believe in a supposed deep state conspiracy against President Donald Trump and allege that Clinton and other high-profile Democrats are involved in criminal activities.

Bill Clinton, like those about many public figures, especially politicians, span a wide range of accusations and speculations. Many of these theories emerged during his tenure as Governor of Arkansas and later as President of the United States, and they have persisted long after he left office

Similar to theories about Hillary Clinton, Bill Clinton has been the subject of the “Clinton Body Count” conspiracy theory. This theory falsely alleges that the Clintons are responsible for a series of deaths of individuals who were supposedly about to expose alleged crimes by the Clintons.

Bill Clinton’s time as Governor of Arkansas accuse him of being involved in illegal drug trafficking, specifically through the Mena Intermountain Municipal Airport. These theories claim that the airport was a hub for smuggling drugs into the United States in the 1980s, under the protection or oversight of Clinton.

The Whitewater controversy, a failed real estate venture from the 1970s involving Bill and Hillary Clinton, spawned numerous conspiracy theories suggesting illegal activities and cover-ups.

Bill Clinton has faced several allegations of sexual misconduct and affairs, most notably with Monica Lewinsky, leading to his impeachment in 1998. While the Lewinsky affair and impeachment are matters of public record.

Bill Clinton’s association with Jeffrey Epstein, who faced charges of sex trafficking before his death in 2019, has fueled conspiracy theories about Clinton’s involvement in Epstein’s criminal activities. Clinton has acknowledged taking trips on Epstein’s private plane but denied any involvement in illegal activities.

Vince Foster, a Deputy White House Counsel during Clinton’s presidency, died by suicide in 1993. Clintons were involved in Foster’s death due to his close working relationship with them. investigations concluded that Foster’s death was a suicide, with no evidence of foul play.

Bill Clinton in a blue dress and red heels was found in Jeffrey Epstein’s Manhattan townhouse. The painting garnered public attention and media coverage after Epstein’s arrest in July 2019 on charges related to sex trafficking. The artwork is considered a provocative piece, meant to evoke a reaction and perhaps comment on Clinton’s relationship with Epstein, though the exact intent behind the painting remains speculative.

The painting is not a photograph but rather an artwork created by an artist, and it has been interpreted as a form of satire or political commentary. Bill Clinton has acknowledged that he knew Epstein but has distanced himself from the convicted sex offender.

Joe Biden, like those about many political figures, range from unfounded claims about his personal life and career to speculative assertions regarding his presidency and policies.

A persistent narrative among some critics and conspiracy theorists is that Biden is experiencing significant cognitive decline, suggesting that he is not mentally fit to serve as President

Conspiracy theories have swirled around a laptop allegedly belonging to Joe Biden’s son, Hunter Biden, which was reported to contain emails regarding his business dealings in Ukraine and China. Some theorists claim that Joe Biden used his position to influence foreign policy in favor of his son’s business.

Following the 2020 Presidential Election, widespread conspiracy theories, often referred to collectively as “The Big Lie,” falsely claimed that the election was stolen from Donald Trump through massive voter fraud and that Biden’s presidency is illegitimate.

Biden has improper ties to China, suggesting that he is compromised or influenced by the Chinese government. These theories often point to Hunter Biden’s business dealings in China as supposed evidence, though no credible evidence has substantiated claims of Joe Biden’s undue influence by China.

Biden’s COVID-19 policies, including vaccine mandates and lockdown measures, with some theorists claiming that these policies are part of broader attempts to control the population or infringe on personal freedoms. These policies are public health measures supported by scientific evidence and aimed at controlling the pandemic.

Biden’s role in the ouster of Ukrainian prosecutor Viktor Shokin, with some claiming Biden did so to protect his son’s business interests in Ukraine.

Over the past fifty years, numerous conspiracy theories have targeted the Democratic Party in the United States, reflecting broader political and social tensions. These theories often emerge within the context of significant political events, elections, and policy debates, and they vary widely in their specifics and the degree to which they gain traction.

1970s to 1980s

Allegations of Communism: During the Cold War, accusations and conspiracy theories often targeted Democrats with claims of secret communist sympathies or infiltration. This was part of a broader trend of anti-communist sentiment that sometimes veered into conspiratorial thinking.


Clinton Era: The presidency of Bill Clinton was rife with conspiracy theories, including those surrounding the Whitewater controversy, the tragic death of Deputy White House Counsel Vince Foster (falsely rumored to have been murdered), and various allegations of corruption and criminality, such as the “Clinton Body Count” theory that baselessly accused the Clintons of being responsible for numerous deaths.


Barack Obama’s Presidency: Conspiracy theories during Obama’s presidency were particularly focused on his background and policies. The most prominent was the “Birther” movement, which falsely claimed Obama was not born in the United States and therefore ineligible to be President. Other theories targeted the Affordable Care Act (Obamacare), alleging it would lead to “death panels,” and various theories suggested Obama was secretly Muslim or had ties to extremist groups.

2010s to Present

Pizzagate: During the 2016 presidential election, a conspiracy theory emerged alleging that high-ranking members of the Democratic Party were involved in a child sex ring operating out of a Washington, D.C., pizzeria. This baseless theory led to a dangerous incident where an armed man entered the pizzeria to “investigate.”

Russian Collusion and the 2016 Election: While the investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election did find evidence of Russian attempts to influence the election in favor of Donald Trump, some conspiracy theorists have spun a narrative that the investigation itself was a “hoax” or a coup attempt orchestrated by Democrats against Trump.

The “Deep State”: This theory alleges that a shadowy network of government officials and agencies is working to undermine the Trump administration (and conservative interests more broadly) from within the government. While concerns about bureaucratic influence are not new, the “Deep State” theory often involves exaggerated claims and unfounded accusations.

2020 Election Fraud: Following the 2020 presidential election, a widespread conspiracy theory, often referred to as “The Big Lie,” falsely claimed that the election was stolen from Donald Trump through massive voter fraud orchestrated by Democrats. Despite extensive investigations, audits, and court rulings, no evidence of widespread fraud that could have affected the election’s outcome was found.

Elon Musk and George Soros are two prominent figures whose influence extends into various sectors, including American policy, despite their foreign-born status—Musk in South Africa and Soros in Hungary. Both have significantly impacted public discourse, policy, and innovation, albeit in markedly different ways.

Musk, born in South Africa, is a technology entrepreneur and business magnate known for founding and leading several high-profile technology companies, including PayPal, SpaceX, Tesla, Inc., Neuralink, and The Boring Company. His ventures focus on electric vehicles, space exploration, renewable energy, and high-speed transportation, among others.

Musk’s influence on American policy is largely through innovation and industry. His companies have spurred policy discussions and adjustments in areas like renewable energy, electric vehicles, space exploration, and infrastructure. Through Tesla, Musk has influenced environmental and energy policies by pushing for electric vehicle adoption. SpaceX has affected space policy and government contracts related to space exploration.

Musk has been vocal on social media about various policy issues, ranging from free speech and regulation to taxation and government subsidies. His political contributions have supported both Democratic and Republican candidates, reflecting a pragmatic approach to engaging with policy issues.

Soros, born in Hungary, is a billionaire investor and philanthropist, known for his vast philanthropic contributions through the Open Society Foundations (OSF). The OSF operates globally, supporting democracy, human rights, the rule of law, and access to education and healthcare.

Soros’s influence on American policy is primarily through philanthropy and political donations. He has funded various initiatives and organizations advocating for policy changes in criminal justice, immigration, democratic governance, and social justice. Soros has been a significant donor to Democratic candidates and causes, aiming to support policies and leaders aligned with his vision of open society principles.

Soros has been the subject of numerous conspiracy theories, often criticized by conservative and right-wing groups for his political donations and activism. Despite controversies, he remains a vocal advocate for democracy, human rights, and social justice.

Musk influences American policy primarily through technological innovation and business leadership, driving change indirectly by shaping markets and industries. In contrast, Soros directly engages with policy through philanthropic efforts and political donations, aiming to effect change by supporting specific causes and candidates.

Musk’s policy influence is centered around technology, innovation, and infrastructure, with a clear focus on the future of transportation, energy, and space exploration. Soros focuses on political and social issues, including democracy, human rights, and justice reforms.

Both figures are polarizing, albeit for different reasons. Musk’s controversies often relate to his statements on social media and business decisions, while Soros is more frequently targeted for his political contributions and philanthropic efforts.

Elon Musk and George Soros are influential figures in American policy, each leveraging their resources and platforms in distinct ways. Musk drives innovation and industry changes that indirectly influence policy, while Soros engages more directly through philanthropy and political donations to advocate for social and political reforms. Both embody the complex interplay between individual influence, public policy, and societal change.

This entry was posted in Miscellaneous. Bookmark the permalink.