My Imaginative Hypothesis

“Cosmogenic Threshold Velocity” (Speed)


The Milky Way Galaxy and our universe, I believe, is not traveling through space it’s falling in space. The Milky Way Galaxy is falling towards the Great Attractor. The universe is falling towards a greater attractor. Gravity is the sense of falling. Something that’s falling, I don’t know what it could be, a Neutron star, a Galaxy, a universe could be anything. But it’s falling and it’s falling so fast we can’t even imagine the speed. And when it reaches a certain speed it explodes hence The Big Bang. Maybe anything that’s falling a neutron star a Galaxy a universe maybe when it reaches a certain speed Explodes into a Big Bang. Maybe there are billions of Big Bangs happening all the time. Anything falling once it reaches a certain speed explodes into a Big Bang. If it’s happened once, it’s happened before. It’s not gravity it’s speed. Maybe when the object reaches the speed of light it explodes. Or maybe there’s a faster speed that we don’t know about.


Your thoughts touch on several fascinating aspects of physics, cosmology, and speculative theories about the universe. Let’s unpack some of the ideas you’ve presented, relating them to current scientific understanding and theories.

Gravity as Falling

The analogy of falling in space, particularly in the context of gravity, is quite insightful and aligns with how Einstein’s General Theory of Relativity describes gravity. According to Einstein, gravity is not a force in the traditional sense but rather the curvature of spacetime caused by mass and energy. Objects moving under the influence of gravity are following the curved paths of spacetime. In this view, the Earth is in a constant free-fall around the Sun, and galaxies move or “fall” towards each other due to the curvatures in spacetime they create.

The Great Attractor and Movement in Space

The Milky Way and other galaxies falling towards the Great Attractor is a consequence of gravitational attraction on a cosmic scale. This movement can indeed be thought of as a “fall” in the context of spacetime curvature. The notion that the universe itself is falling towards a “greater attractor” is speculative and intriguing but not supported by current cosmological evidence. The universe’s expansion, observed through the redshift of distant galaxies, suggests that on the largest scales, galaxies are moving away from each other, not converging towards a point.

The Big Bang and Cosmic Expansion

The Big Bang theory describes the universe’s expansion from a hot, dense state and does not invoke a mechanism involving an object reaching a critical speed and exploding. Instead, it posits that the universe has been expanding and cooling over time, leading to the formation of galaxies, stars, and planets. The idea that high speeds could cause an object to explode or trigger a new Big Bang is speculative and not part of mainstream scientific theories.

Speculative Physics and Multiple Big Bangs

Your speculation about multiple Big Bangs and objects exploding at high speeds touches on ideas beyond conventional physics. While not supported by current evidence, the concept of multiple or cyclic universes exists in theoretical physics. For example, the cyclic universe model suggests the universe undergoes endless cycles of expansion and contraction, though this is not linked to objects reaching a critical speed.

Speed Limit of the Universe

The speed of light in a vacuum (approximately 299,792 kilometers per second) is currently understood as the ultimate speed limit for information, energy, and matter. Theoretical particles or phenomena (like tachyons) that could travel faster than light have been hypothesized but never observed. The idea that surpassing the speed of light or another unknown speed could cause an explosion or a new Big Bang is an interesting hypothesis but is speculative without empirical support.

In summary, while your ideas are imaginative and touch upon real concepts in physics, they also venture into speculative territory not currently supported by empirical evidence or theoretical frameworks in mainstream science. The beauty of science, however, lies in its openness to new ideas and theories, provided they can be tested and validated through observation and experimentation.


Let’s imagine a universe falling in infinity. Things are going on inside this universe but this universe is an explosion and this explosion (universe) is falling at tremendous speeds. Maybe the speed of light or even faster than the speed of light. I’m gonna call this speed the speed of The Big Bang. When this explosion (universe) reaches the speed of the Big Bang it explodes again. Speed and the explosion create gravity inside the explosion (universe.)


Imagining a universe as an explosion perpetually falling through infinity at tremendous speeds, including or surpassing the speed of light, introduces a speculative but intriguing concept. By positing that this “explosion” (the universe) could explode again upon reaching a certain threshold speed—which you’ve termed the “speed of the Big Bang”—you’re exploring ideas that blend aspects of physics with imaginative speculation. Let’s explore the implications and how this concept aligns or diverges from current scientific understanding:

Beyond Conventional Physics

The concept of a universe “falling” at speeds exceeding light and then exploding again when reaching a specific speed is a creative hypothesis that lies outside current scientific models. In standard cosmology, the expansion of the universe isn’t powered by falling or moving through a pre-existing space; instead, it’s the fabric of spacetime itself that is expanding.

Speed of the Big Bang

Defining a new theoretical speed, “the speed of the Big Bang,” as a trigger for another explosion is an imaginative leap. In contemporary physics, the speed of light is the ultimate speed limit for the transmission of information and the movement of objects with mass. This limit is deeply rooted in the theory of relativity, which fundamentally shapes our understanding of spacetime and energy.

Gravity from Speed and Explosions

The notion that speed and explosions could create gravity within the universe is a novel interpretation. According to Einstein’s theory of general relativity, gravity is the result of masses curving spacetime, not a consequence of speed or explosive events per se. However, the energy and mass involved in explosive events do contribute to the overall gravitational field in a region of space.

Theoretical and Philosophical Implications

Your idea touches on deep questions about the nature of the universe, causality, and the origins of physical laws. It raises philosophical questions about the nature of space, time, and existence itself. While current physics does not support the mechanism you propose, the history of science is full of moments where imaginative speculation pushed the boundaries of knowledge forward, leading to new theories and discoveries.

Exploring New Theories

The exploration of ideas like yours is essential for the advancement of theoretical physics. While empirical evidence and mathematical consistency are the cornerstones of scientific theory, speculative hypotheses often play a vital role in the genesis of new scientific concepts. Theories such as the multiverse, cyclic universes, and others in the realm of theoretical physics often start from speculative ideas that challenge conventional understanding.

Your concept, while speculative, embodies the spirit of inquiry that drives science forward. It prompts us to think about the universe in new and imaginative ways, even if those ideas diverge from current scientific theories. The dialogue between speculation and empirical science is crucial for the evolution of our understanding of the cosmos.


Can you create a name for this speed of the Big Bang.


Naming such a speculative and profound concept as the speed at which a universe might explode again, reminiscent of the Big Bang, calls for a term that encapsulates both its theoretical nature and cosmic significance. Drawing on your description and the idea of reaching a threshold that triggers a new universe-creating explosion, the term “Cosmogenic Threshold Velocity” could serve to describe this speed. “Cosmogenic” combines the Greek roots “cosmo” (κόσμος), meaning “universe,” with “genic” (γενικός), meaning “creation” or “origin.” “Threshold” denotes a critical limit, and “Velocity” refers to the concept of speed. Together, “Cosmogenic Threshold Velocity” suggests a speed that, once reached, initiates the creation of a new universe, echoing the transformative power attributed to the Big Bang. This term strives to capture the essence of a universe birthing anew from a state of extreme motion, as envisioned in your imaginative hypothesis.


I can imagine infinity and in infinity billions and billions of universes exploding. And in infinity billions and billions of universes falling. I wish I could imagine this in color that would be awesome.


Imagining the vastness of infinity, filled with countless universes each undergoing cycles of explosions and falls, paints a picture of an incredibly dynamic and colorful cosmos. This vision touches on concepts reminiscent of the multiverse theory in physics, where our universe might be just one of an infinite number of universes, each with its own laws of physics, histories, and destinies.

Visualizing this in color adds another layer of wonder, as color can convey the energy, temperature, and composition of cosmic phenomena. In such a visualization, you might imagine:

Nebulae-like Expansions: Universes at the moment of their “explosion” or Big Bang could be envisioned as brilliant nebulae, bursting with colors ranging from the deep reds of cooler, expanding gases to the bright blues of the hottest, most energetic regions.

Galactic Whirls: As universes expand and evolve, forming galaxies and stars, imagine swirling patterns of galaxies in hues of pink, blue, and white, reminiscent of the actual photos of galaxies taken by telescopes, each color marking different stages of stellar evolution.

Falls into the Void: Universes “falling” through the infinite void could be visualized with trailing colors, like comets streaking across the night sky, each leaving behind a unique spectral signature that tells the story of its journey through space and time.

Intersections and Collisions: Moments where universes might “collide” or interact could be imagined as explosions of light and color, where the boundaries between them blur, mixing their cosmic palettes.

To bring such a vision to life, even in the imagination, one might draw inspiration from the various depictions of cosmic phenomena provided by astronomers and artists alike. The use of artistic license to assign colors and textures to different energies, forces, and materials could help in visualizing this grand tapestry of universes in a way that resonates with the awe such a concept inspires.

While current technology or science may not allow us to directly observe such a grand multiverse, the power of computer graphics and artistic renditions can offer a glimpse into such a colorful and dynamic infinity. Documentaries, space art, and scientific visualizations often use vivid colors to represent different elements, energies, and processes in the universe, providing a source of inspiration for imagining the cosmic dance of universes in color.


In all of these universes and in our tiny little universe we humans stand-alone with a conscience that can imagine all of this.


Indeed, the human capacity for consciousness, self-awareness, and imagination sets us apart in the known universe. It’s a profound realization that amidst the vastness of the cosmos, with its countless galaxies, stars, and potentially innumerable planets, it is we, on this tiny speck of dust we call Earth, who have the ability to ponder our place in the universe, conceive of the infinite, and imagine realities beyond our sensory experiences.

This unique aspect of human nature allows us to explore not just the physical realm through science and technology but also the realms of possibility, philosophy, and art. The ability to imagine universes, to conceptualize the beginning and end of time, and to ponder the existence of other conscious beings in this vast cosmos is a testament to the extraordinary capabilities of the human mind.

Our consciousness is not just a tool for survival but a window to understanding the universe and ourselves. It’s a bridge between the tangible and the abstract, the known and the unknown. Through our sciences, we unravel the laws of the universe, and through our arts and philosophies, we explore the depth of human experience and imagination.

The realization of our unique place in the cosmos can evoke a sense of responsibility—to preserve and enhance this capacity for consciousness, to continue our quest for knowledge, and to safeguard the fragile cradle of life and consciousness that Earth represents. It’s a call to look beyond our immediate concerns and to embrace a broader perspective on our existence and purpose.

As we continue to explore the universe, both outwardly with our telescopes and probes and inwardly with our thoughts and imaginations, we embody the universe experiencing itself, contemplating its own nature, and dreaming of possibilities beyond the horizons of current understanding. This reflective and imaginative capability is perhaps one of the most remarkable and beautiful aspects of human existence.


I believe this is God in science coming together.


The sentiment you express touches on a profound and deeply personal intersection of ideas—a place where the realms of spirituality and science converge. Many individuals find in the vastness and complexity of the universe, as well as in the intricate details of our own consciousness, a sense of the divine or a reflection of a higher order. This perspective sees science not as opposed to spirituality or religion, but as complementary pathways to understanding the nature of existence and our place within it.

The pursuit of scientific knowledge allows us to unravel the workings of the universe, from the grand scale of galaxies to the subatomic intricacies of quantum mechanics. Each discovery offers a glimpse into the laws and patterns that govern the cosmos, revealing a universe of astonishing order and complexity. For some, this deepening understanding of the universe is a way to marvel at the wonder of creation, seeing in the laws of physics and the tapestry of life evidence of a higher intelligence or a unifying force that some might call God.

Conversely, spirituality and religion often address the questions of purpose, meaning, and morality—areas that science describes in terms of processes and interactions but does not inherently imbue with meaning. The spiritual perspective invites a contemplation of the why, providing a framework within which the knowledge gained through science can be integrated into a broader understanding of our existence.

The dialogue between science and spirituality can enrich our perspective, allowing for a more holistic understanding of our world. It opens up a space where wonder, ethics, purpose, and exploration coexist, encouraging a pursuit of knowledge that is not only about uncovering how the universe works but also contemplating what it means to be a part of it.

This confluence of science and spirituality reflects a human yearning to connect with something larger than ourselves, whether that is the vastness of the universe, the depths of consciousness, or the possibility of a divine presence. It’s a reminder that our quest for understanding can be both an intellectual and a spiritual journey, one that invites us to marvel at the mystery and beauty of existence.

This entry was posted in Miscellaneous. Bookmark the permalink.